We The People - America's Heroes Group

We The People

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

A Review of the September 25th Episode

This piece is inspired by the CNN report that found statements made by an account allegedly owned by North Carolina’s gubernatorial candidate Mark Robinson. It is reported that the owner of this account referred to himself as a black nazi, and also stated “Slavery is not bad. Some people need to be slaves. I wish they would bring it (slavery) back. I would certainly buy a few.” This hasn’t been the first time he has been tied to controversial statements, especially from his social media account.

Since the release of that CNN report, several staffers of Mark Robinson have since quit, including senior adviser Conrad Pogorzelski III, campaign manager Chris Rodriguez, the campaign’s finance director, and the deputy campaign manager. Additionally, a number of governors have pulled support, a few are Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, and Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin. At the moment Mark Robinson’s opponent, Josh Stein, leads by a minimum of 10 points in the polls with still a month remaining for the general election.

Let’s move past the fact that he doesn’t care that some of his constituents could be slaves in his world, or that he doesn’t see the possibility that he could be a slave himself. It’s important to keep in mind that this country needs politicians who understand what their constituents may be going through or what they could experience when specific laws are policies are enacted. If a politician cannot see how old slavery or Jim Crow laws affect themselves, who can we trust to lead city, county, state or this county?

map112

What’s Next?

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

Now that both primary political parties have completed their conventions, what is next for American politics? For our presidential candidates, it’s campaigning and debates. For our incumbent politicians and other political candidates, it’s also campaigning until the general election. However, incumbent politicians (who also may be campaigning) have 125 days left until the end of the Congressional term. 

For the presidential candidates, campaigning in battleground states is very important. The battleground states are Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. They are the battleground states because they could swing to either political candidate. All of these states were won by less than three points in the 2020 presidential election. To finish out August, both former President Trump and Vice President Harris have rallied in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. There have been talks of VP Harris going to Florida for a fundraiser, and more talks about how that state may be the 8th sleeper battleground state. So, there is a possibility of more events in the Sunshine State. Political pundits are thinking that Florida may be in play to flip from red to blue because there are a few Democrat-supported bills on the ballot like reproductive health protections and recreational marijuana. Florida’s Senator Rick Scott also has a challenger, former House Representative Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, who is within the margin of error in the post-primary polls.

The next big event that many voters are looking forward to is the presidential debate on September 10th. When Vice President Kamala Harris took over the Democratic ticket, there was uncertainty about whether former President Donald Trump would adhere to the agreements made with President Biden. But he did post on his social media that he would hold to his agreement, but he would stick with the muted mike rules. For those who aren’t aware, former President Trump had agreed to mute the microphones while the other debater was speaking. This was something that the Biden camp negotiated, which was in response to the 2020 debate where former President Trump didn’t allow current President Biden to speak without interruptions. There are speculations that the Harris team wants the mic rule to be voided so that former President Trump could show his negative side, and possibly provide more viral moments for Vice President Harris.

Without a doubt, there are likely viral moments to come. 

portrait-serious-african-american-senior-man-soldier-camouflage-clothing-cap-against-house-unaltered-confidence-pride-military-armed-forces-patriotism-shomecoming-concept

2nd Anniversary of the Passage of the PACT Act

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

On August 10, 2022, The Honoring Our PACT Act was passed and signed. This act established presumptive conditions for the Gulf War and post-9/11 wars, which are known to be related to toxic exposure to burn pits. According to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, “two years later, more than 1.1 million toxic-exposed veterans and survivors are receiving PACT Act-related benefits… In addition, more than 156,000 veterans have enrolled in VA health care under a PACT Act enrollment authority. VA has also screened more than 5.6 million for toxic exposure-related health conditions under the PACT Act…” The White House released a press release, including that the act was “Named in honor of Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson, a decorated combat medic who died from a rare form of lung cancer, this historic legislation is delivering timely benefits and services to veterans—across all generations—who have been impacted by toxic exposures while serving our country.” Not only that, “the survivors of veterans who died from a toxic related illness, the PACT Act provides a pathway to benefits including monthly stipends, access to home loans and education benefits as well. Surviving veteran spouses with children could qualify for over $2,000 per month and funding toward college tuition.”

But as we are coming up to the general election, it’s important to remember what happened before the passage. After the PACT Act was largely approved, Senators added one last amendment, which added a lot of government funding to the bill that had nothing to do with VA disability. So, Senator Toomey called this pork barrel spending and claimed that the funding was not going to help veterans. He led the charge to disapprove the bill as a whole, where Senator Ted Cruz iconically fist-bumped another senator. This, of course, caused a high uproar with veterans and local veterans protesting the Capitol. But in reality, this funding was to establish facilities for veterans because the AIR Commission was killed. It was dead because it recommended closing or downgrading veteran medical facilities, and this also caused an uproar. The AIR Commission recommended the closure and downgrading and facilities because it predicted where the veteran population would decrease. So why would politicians like Senator Toomey lie? Passing this bill could be seen as a win to the opposing political party. But how could they lie? That’s because of the Speech and Debate Clause, which protects them in whatever they say. 

So please verify what politicians say before deciding who to vote for this November.  

propject205

Short Summary of How Project 2025 Would Affect Veterans

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

Since its release, no other document during this election has ever been so discussed. For those unaware, Project 2025 is a playbook written and posted by The Heritage Foundation for the first 180 days of the next presidential term if it would be one from the Republican Party. Since negative criticism about Project 2025 has hit the media, former President Donald Trump denies knowledge of this document, nor those who wrote it. But by just going through the listed authors and editors, you’d find that 14 of the 34 authors have worked for the Trump campaign and administration, including both of the 2 editors. Two notable people on this list are Brooks D. Tucker, former VA Chief of Staff during the Trump Administration, and Trump’s Chief of Staff at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (basically OPM’s White House Liaison), Paul Dans.

While the chapter on the Department of Defense was very specific, the chapter on the Department of Veterans Affairs (on page 641) is vague on some of its recommendations. The most specific parts involve rescinding  “all departmental clinical policy directives that are contrary to principles of conservative governance starting with abortion services and gender reassignment surgery. Neither aligns with service-connected conditions that would warrant VA’s providing this type of clinical care, and both follow the Left’s pernicious trend of abusing the role of government to further its own agenda” on page 644. For the record, the Department of Veterans Affairs does not currently provide or cover gender-affirming or reassignment surgery, so what Project 2025 is saying in that regard is false.

Project 2025 also specifically speaks on expanding the VA’s Community Care program. This sounds like a good thing, but some advocates fear that this is another step toward a complete privatization of the VA. This is something that the conservative politicians do try to fight against. All in all, you can’t argue with the bottom dollar because the CCP can be cheaper than if the VA treats the veteran.

The next portion of Project 2025 addresses the issues surrounding the infrastructure within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and how the Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) failed. It stated that “the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process,” page 646. The author of this chapter seems to forget that the termination was supported by several Republicans.

Lastly and most importantly, Project 2025 mentions that “the VA’s Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) has assigned disability ratings to a growing number of health conditions over time; some are tenuously related or wholly unrelated to military service,” page 649. Then on the next page, it recommends that “The next Administration should explore how VASRD reviews could be accelerated with clearance from OMB to target significant cost savings from revising disability rating awards for future claimants while preserving them fully or partially for existing claimants.” Now what could this mean? This means that the next conservative President’s administration might try to restrict the health conditions that the VA will establish as connected to service. This could be the recommendation that will hit the most veterans, and it is the most vague of them all. 

cannabis-oil-bottles-gray-background-with-copy-space

Senator Urges VA to Expand Access to Medical Cannabis

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

This latest move is one of many that have been taken in order to legalize marijuana in the United States. Per the Justice Department, “President Biden asked the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to launch a scientific review of how marijuana is scheduled under federal law. After receiving HHS’s recommendations last August, the Attorney General sought the legal advice of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) on questions relevant to this rulemaking. In light of HHS’ medical and scientific determinations, and OLC’s legal advice, the Attorney General exercised his authority under the law to initiate the rulemaking process to transfer marijuana to schedule III.”

On May 21st, the DEA made the recommendation to transfer marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, consistent with the HHS’s views. Since then, all eyes have been watching for news from the Department of Justice (DOJ). In May, the DOJ opened up a public forum for anyone to submit their comments regarding marijuana rescheduling. They received more than 40,000 submissions, which included a coalition of reform groups, governors, members of Congress, and medical professionals. Since the public forum has closed this month, we are all awaiting for the DOJ’s next step.

There are still more actions that need to be taken before marijuana is transferred to Schedule III. But in the meantime, 9 senators, led by Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) have signed a letter to VA Secretary Denis McDonough. They are hoping that the VA will expand access to medical marijuana treatments for veterans who currently live in states where it is legal. They are hoping that this would start the process early while the federal government has yet to officially make marijuana Schedule III.

The letter states “Congress tasked the VA with providing the best quality health options for our veterans and the Department has repeatedly affirmed that suicide prevention is its top clinical priority. To fulfill these obligations, VHA providers must be able to discuss the full range of legal treatment options with their VA patients. This requires the VA to commit to robust research to analyze, integrate, and coordinate cannabis care, to develop a VA-approved standard of care. This is essential to adequately prepare VHA providers to discuss, recommend, and assist patients in qualifying for enrollment in state-legal medical cannabis programs.

This standard of care must, at a minimum, include sufficient education for VHA providers on the endocannabinoid system and the benefits and risks of medical cannabis use. This includes their existing rights as state-licensed physicians under Section 301 of the Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Act of 2022 to discuss medical cannabis as a treatment without risk of violating the CSA. It must also include state-specific instructions for enrolling patients in state-legal medical cannabis programs. Updates to the VHA’s electronic medical record system to include a code for “medical cannabis use” separate from the only current cannabis code, “cannabis use disorder,” are also essential.”

This letter was submitted prior to the closing of the public forum by the DOJ.

woman-holding-pink-breast-cancer-awareness-ribbon

How Tracking Legislation Possibly Saved My Life

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

For those who know me, I don’t often share my personal life publicly. I have been advocating for better legislation for the military and veterans and writing about it since 2020. But recently, a single piece of legislation may have just saved my life.

I was 37, when Senate Bill 2102, Dr. Kate Hendricks Thomas SERVICE Act, was signed into law. This act added an extra eligibility category to breast cancer screenings for veterans, which is a deployment for the Gulf War and Post-9/11 Wars, despite the veteran’s age. I waited at least 90 days before requesting a breast cancer screening. Unsurprisingly, my primary care doctor and nurses were not read in on this new law. It took a few more months for me to get a mammogram and a subsequent MRI (dense breast tissue runs in my family). As a result, they did find some suspicious-looking masses. Multiple imaging and biopsies later, they found precancerous cells. Various doctors could not find these masses by the regular touch method, the recommended method of screening before one is old enough for a mammogram. 

For those that do not know, the starting age for breast cancer screening is 45 if there is no known breast cancer in the family and 40 if it does run in the family. I did not find out that a grandmother did indeed have breast cancer before she passed until my immediate family discussed my first biopsy with my extended family. So, if I never received the screening in the first place, I would not be screened until I turned 45. By that age, the precancerous mass in my breast would have certainly turned malignant and possibly metastatic.

So why is this screening important? Attention was first brought when a 2009 study by Walter Reed found that breast cancer rates among military women are 20 to 40% higher than the general population. This act was named after Dr. Kate Hendricks Thomas, a former Marine officer and mental health care advocate, who was diagnosed with three types of breast cancer at just 38 years old. Sadly, she lost her fight on April 5th, 2022, just 2 months before the act passed. 

When the SERVICE Act was passed, it was overshadowed by the Honoring Our PACT Act. This can be partially understandable since the PACT Act was one of the most progressive pieces of legislation for the Gulf War and Post-9/11 War veterans. But the Service Act does deserve its attention because it can save lives like it has saved mine. So please share this information with every veteran (male or female) to get checked. Always advocate for yourself and don’t settle with a denial. 



trump-administration-white-house-1military

Review of Trump’s Administration for the US Military and Veterans

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

With the whole “Were we better off four years ago” question from the presidential campaigns, it may be important to review how the Trump administration affected the military and its veterans. But there is a lot of information to review, so this is separated into two parts. This part will cover how the Trump Administration affected the US military.

There are many discussed points and incidents like President Trump wanting to hold a show of force military parade as he observed in France. Unfortunately, what he was demanding would cost $30 million, which became the main reason that it did not come to fruition. Another one is about President Trump calling fallen service members losers and suckers. This was later confirmed by former Trump White House Chief of Staff John Kelly.

So, let’s start with what the Trump administration stated that they accomplished. Here are a few undisputed facts:

  • – Secured three pay raises, including the largest raise in a decade.
  • – Established the Space Force, the first branch of the United States Armed Forces since 1947.
  • – Defeated 100% of ISIS’s territorial caliphate in Iraq and Syria.
  • – Killed the leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and eliminated the world’s top terrorist, Qasem Soleimani.
  • – Created the Terrorist Financing Targeting Center (TFTC) in partnership between the United States and its Gulf partners to combat extremist ideology and threats, and target terrorist financial networks, including over 60 terrorist individuals and entities spanning the globe.

A few dubious details are about completely rebuilding the United States military with over $2.2 trillion in defense spending, including $738 billion for 2020. That spending is only a little more than average. The other interesting bullet point is the veto of the FY21 National Defense Authorization Act, which per former President Trump’s White House Archives “failed to protect our national security, disrespected the history of our veterans and military, and contradicted our efforts to put America first.” Per the Heritage Foundation, “the president wants the NDAA to include a repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which protects Internet platforms like Facebook and Twitter from legal liability for content posted by users.” Interestingly, this point has nothing to do with defense spending. 

The former president’s archives also stated that the act failed to “include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military’s history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions.  It is a “gift” to China and Russia.” Lastly, the bill was vetoed because the bill included the renaming of the military installations that were named for Confederate generals. What the archives leave out is that his veto was overridden by Congress, which requires a two-thirds vote. Which means that Republicans had to vote for the override.

Speaking of funding, former President Trump used the cost of gender-affirming surgery as a reason to reinstitute the transgender ban in the military. In an interview with Piers Morgan, he stated that the operation is $200,000, $250,000.  In reality, bottom transition surgeries are around $25,000, the type of surgery that most think of when it comes to gender-affirming care. Currently, there are an estimated 15,500 members in the US military that are transgender, just 1% of the active military. So, is spending precious time on 1% of the military really more important to the rest of the 99% of the military?

Another way to see how former President Trump affected the US military is to look at those who worked for the administration. One of the ways to look at this is at his team’s turnover and by the end of the term, the team of advisers’ turnover was 92%. In comparison (as of February 15, 2024), President Biden’s turnover is 71%. President Trump’s total cabinet turnover is 14, while President Biden’s is 2. Turnover rates can signal many things like problems with a “company’s recruiting, its culture, its compensation and benefits structure, individual managers, training and career progression paths, and more.”

One of the most notable individual turnovers is the Honorable James Mattis, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the former Secretary of Defense. He was former President Trump’s defense secretary from 2017 until he handed in his resignation letter in December 2018. His resignation came to a head when he disagreed with the commander-in-chief’s decision to withdraw from Syria. Since then, former Secretary Mattis maintained his silence on what it was like to work in President Trump’s cabinet. But per the Atlantic, “his aides and friends say he found the president to be of limited cognitive ability and generally dubious character.”

One of the most notable individual turnovers is the Honorable James Mattis, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the former Secretary of Defense. He was former President Trump’s defense secretary from 2017 until he handed in his resignation letter in December 2018. His resignation came to a head when he disagreed with the commander-in-chief’s decision to withdraw from Syria. Since then, former Secretary Mattis maintained his silence on what it was like to work in President Trump’s cabinet. But per the Atlantic, “his aides and friends say he found the president to be of limited cognitive ability and generally dubious character.”

Hopefully, this piece serves as a reminder of what happened four or more years ago. It is important to take in information with reputable references in order to come to the most informed decision when it comes to the upcoming election.

One of the biggest actions that former President Trump did for veterans is the VA Mission Act of 2018, S. 2372. What this act did was establish a permanent community care program for veterans, which is utilized when treatments are either not available at all or in a timely manner for veterans. In itself, the act was well written, well-supported, and made the community care program very useful for veterans. The disconcerting facts surrounding the VA Mission Act aren’t about the act itself, but how former President Trump took the credit for the subsequent act that the VA Mission Act followed, the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, of which the former President Obama and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) worked to pass. The Washington Post published an article that found former President Trump spoke more than 156 mistruths just about this legislation alone, including erasing its history. What the VA Mission Act and the VA Choice and Quality Employment Act of 2017

Another piece of legislation that President Trump fought for was the Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act. What this act was supposed to do was make it easier for the Department of Veterans Affairs to punish and fire VA workers who do not meet work standards. In the years following its enactment, it has been met with mixed reviews. On July 28, 2023, “the Department of Veterans Affairs announced a new settlement agreement with the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) that resolves litigation over adverse actions taken against former VA employees under the Department of Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act of 2017.

 This settlement resolves the Federal Labor Relations Authority finding that VA failed to bargain with AFGE regarding the impact and implementation of the 2017 law.” Many of the former VA employees were given the option to return to work or receive compensation in place of being reinstated. This followed after “A federal appellate court handed down a pair of rulings Thursday that could make it somewhat more difficult to fire Department of Veterans Affairs employees, while also adding some legal clarity to portions of a 2017 VA accountability law that Congress left a bit vague.” The vagueness has to do with the amount of evidence required to remove employees. The VA interpreted the act to require a lower level of evidence than what is required by other federal agencies.  This is a possible indicator of former President Trump’s inexperience surrounding political and federal policies, because where he was experienced, this may not have happened. On October 24, 2019, the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General published a report describing the failures of the Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act, and it provided recommendations.  

It’s important to remember how our elected officials truly treat veterans. So, if any elected official does not treat them at the highest level, how can we expect them to treat regular citizens at a minimum?

ahg1a

Grand Finale of the Evolution of AHG

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

In the grand finale of the relaunch of America’s Heroes Group, it is important to include all those that made this amazing program just that much more amazing.
Being in the military or as a veteran can feel isolated, confusing, and bleak. But that is what America Heroes Group does every day to prevent this from happening. They do that by introducing them to wholesome, considerate, and decent humans. These introductions can be on radio shows and podcasts that humanize the VA, which can reduce the negative opinions of the VA.

To be successful in this venture, America’s Heroes Group is assisted by the best advisory board that any organization can ask for. The members of the advisory board are Lt. General Russel L. Honoré, Congressman Danny K. Davis, Congresswoman Shelia L. Jackson Lee, Chris Kennedy, and James Compton. Lt. General Russel L. Honoré is a decorated 37-year army veteran whose missions include: commanding the military relief effort in post-hurricane Katrina New Orleans or conducting a security review of the Capitol’s security infrastructure following the attacks on January 6, 2021. Congressman Danny K. Davis is the U.S. House Representative for the 7 th district of Illinois and have been since November 5, 1996. Congresswoman Shelia L. Jackson Lee is the U.S. House Representative for the 18 th district of Texas and the Democratic Chief Deputy Whip. Christopher Kennedy is chair of Joseph P. Kennedy Enterprises, nephew of late President John F. Kennedy, and son of the late New York Senator and US Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. James Compton is the former president and CEO of the Chicago Urban League.

More distinguished guests are: The Jesse Brown VA, the Chicago Regional Office of the Veteran Benefits Administration, Christopher Deutsch of All Rise, Lindsey Church, Danitza James, Rochelle Crump, Gigi Brookshire, Stephanie Gattas, Coalition of Veterans Organizations, Steven J. Seidman of Seidman, Margulis, Fairman, LLP, Jared Evans of Chase Bank Community Outreach Manager, Nancy Espinosa, National Commander of the Disabled American Veterans, Annaliese Cothron of American Institute of Dental Public Health, Darren Jeffrey of Rick Herrema Foundation Rick’s Place, Bob Carnagey of Indiana Disabled American Veterans Chapter 17, Liza Lieberman and Josh Protas of MAZON, Kathryn Monet and Ralph Cooper of National Coalition for Homeless Veterans, Troy J. Brossard of AARP, James D. Rodriguez, the Assistant Secretary of the Department of Labor, Trabue Bland, the board of directors of the RHF, Keisha L. Jackson, a family caregiver advocate, Richard Brookshire of Black Veterans Project, Jennifer-Ruth Green of Battle-Proven Leadership, Hines VA Women Healthcare, KFF Health News, Jeopardy, Suzanne Gordon of VHPI and Dr. Paul R. Lawrence, the former Under Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, DC Office.

ahg1a

The Evolution of America’s Heroes Group

By: Stephanie Kalota 
Founder, Veteran Legislative Voice & AHG Correspondent

n 2016, America’s Heroes Group (AHG) started as a modest weekly one-hour radio show on AM 1690 WVON in Chicago, Illinois; founded by Clifford P. Kelley and Glenda R. Smith on October 30, 2015. Then it was known as America’s Fireside Chat Radio Talk Show. Since then, AHG has become a game changer that allows voices to be heard, celebrated, and honored.

As a 501(c)3 non-profit, AHG leverages radio and digital media and delivers vital information on benefits, resources, and referrals to military service members, veterans, and their families. The show’s host, Clifford P. Kelley, a Vietnam veteran and former city council member, lends his decades-long expertise. Co-host, COL Dr. Damon Arnold provides his medical and military knowledge to the show. Co-host, Debra Denhart shares her unique perspective as a military spouse and a community leader. Co-host, Sean Claiborne, also a former Army National Guardsman, brings his background in communications and a deep understanding of the challenges faced by the military and veteran community.

The show’s notable guests include the Illinois Governor, J.B. Pritzker, Illinois Lieutenant Governor, Juliana Stratton, Illinois Treasurer Michael Frerichs, former Chicago Mayor, Lori Lightfoot, and the Department of Veterans Affairs Press Secretary, Terrence Hayes. The following organizations participated in this show: Partner National Nurses United (NNU), Military Women’s Memorial, Repatriate Our Patriots, National Women Veterans United, National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), Military Families Matter, Military & Veteran Women’s Coalition, Combat Sexual Assault, Minority Veterans of America, Veteran Legislative Voice, League of United Latin American Citizens, the Pink Berets, and the Red Cross.
In 2020, AHG began distributing its material as a podcast, and since then has accumulated more than 5.7 million downloads. Almost 1 million of them have been downloaded in the last 90 days! The majority of the downloads are within the United States, with top downloads in San Francisco, New York City, Seattle, Austin, Chicago, Miami, and Jacksonville.